Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Labor - Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Cases filed in the South Carolina District Court before Sol Blatt Jr [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 6 of 6
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
May 30, 2007
McDonald v. Assurant Inc et al SC Blatt Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff: Dan M McDonald, Sr; Defendant: Assurant Inc, American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida, Jason Stout, Kenneth Nix
 
March 11, 2007
Testa v. Hartford Life Insurance Company SC Blatt Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff: Lila Jean Testa; Defendant: Hartford Life Insurance Company
 
October 30, 2005
Pringle v. Federal Express Corporation Long term Disability Plan SC Blatt Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
September 15, 2005
Litchfield v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina SC Blatt Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
March 28, 2005
Chassereau v Nevamar Company LLC SC Blatt Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
January 19, 2005
Conklin v. Certainteed Corp SC Blatt Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.