Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Intellectual Property - Patent Cases filed in the South Carolina District Court before Margaret B Seymour [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 5 of 5
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
April 1, 2009
Palmer v. Advent Product Development Inc et al SC Seymour Patent Federal Question
Plaintiff: Kenneth Palmer; Defendant: Advent Product Development Inc, Triad Resource Inc, Richard W Goldstein, Goldstein Law Offices PC
 
February 5, 2009
Hubbell Incorporated et al v. Dynamic Lighting Inc et al SC Seymour Patent Federal Question
Plaintiff: Hubbell Incorporated, Hubbell Lighting Inc; Defendant: Dynamic Lighting Inc, Dynamic Lighting Solutions LLC, SomersKempf Inc
 
April 3, 2008
Fabio Perini North America Inc et al v. Paper Converting Machine Company SC Seymour Patent Federal Question
Plaintiff: Fabio Perini North America Inc, KPL Packaging SPA; Defendant: Paper Converting Machine Company
 
March 28, 2008
Trade Management Group Limited v. Innovative Office Products Inc SC Seymour Patent Patent Infringement
Plaintiff: Trade Management Group Limited; Defendant: Innovative Office Products Inc
 
February 8, 2007
Sonoco Development Inc v. Caraustar Industries Inc et al SC Seymour Patent Patent Infringement
Plaintiff: Sonoco Development Inc; Defendant: Caraustar Industries Inc, Caraustar Industrial and Consumer Products Group Inc
 
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.