US District Court for the District of South Dakota Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Dentinger v. The Holy Church
as 4:2019cv04106
Plaintiff:
Philip Thomas Dentinger
Defendant:
The Holy Church
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2017cv04026
Plaintiff:
Leslie Johnson
Defendant:
State of South Dakota, Denny Kaemingk and CBM Food Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hill et al v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 3:2016cv03016
Plaintiff:
Ross Hill , Angie Hill , Kevin Bradberry and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama, Premera Blue Cross, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Howes v. Yankton Medical Clinic, P.C. et al
as 4:2015cv04177
Plaintiff:
Connie Howes
Defendant:
Yankton Medical Clinic, P.C. and Michael Pietila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Med-Star Paramedic Ambulance, Inc. v. City of Sioux Falls et al
as 4:2015cv04045
Plaintiff:
Med-Star Paramedic Ambulance, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Sioux Falls and Sioux Falls Regional Emergency Medical Services Authority
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
USA v. Chiropractic Associates, LTD of South Dakota
as 4:2013cv04030
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Chiropractic Associates, LTD of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Fast Horse v. Red Cloud et al
as 5:2012cv05040
Plaintiff:
Lavern C. Fast Horse
Defendant:
Oliver Red Cloud and James Red Cloud
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hansen v. LG Philips LCD Company LTD et al
as 4:2007cv04033
Plaintiff:
Chad Hansen
Defendant:
LG Philips LCD Company LTD, LG Philips LCD America, Inc., LG Electronics Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Crawford v. Nvidia Corporation et al
as 5:2007cv05019
Plaintiff:
Christopher C. Crawford
Defendant:
Nvidia Corporation, ATI Technologies, Inc., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Bessette v. Au Optronics Corporation et al
as 5:2007cv05013
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bessette and Christopher Bessette
Defendant:
Au Optronics Corporation, Au Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
