US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,567
Brown v. City of Franklin, Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Timothy Brown
Defendant:
City of Franklin, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Doe #061 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
John Doe #061
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Liles v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Dustin Liles
Defendant:
Governor Bill Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jordan v. Target Corporation
as 3:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Marcia Jordan
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrimination
Doe #60 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
John Doe #60
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe (HWB) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
John Doe (HWB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stacy v. Clarksville Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Dylan Stacy
Defendant:
Clarksville Police Department, City of Clarksville and Jamal Alquzweeni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taliaferro v. HCA et al
as 3:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Linda Taliaferro
Defendant:
HCA and HCA Centennial Head and Neck Surgery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
New Muslim Party v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
New Muslim Party
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burgess v. City of Pulaski/City of Pulaski Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Wayne Burgess
Defendant:
City of Pulaski/City of Pulaski Police Department, Officer Joel Robison, Officer John Dickey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
