US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Harkness v. United Sates of America
as 2:2010cv02868
Plaintiff:
Furniss Harkness
Defendant:
United Sates of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gipson v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2010cv02791
Plaintiff:
Reggie Frank Gipson
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Austin v. Illinois Central Railroad Company et al
as 2:2010cv02143
Plaintiff:
Louis Austin
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company, Illinois Central Railroad Company and Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
McKendree v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
as 2:2010cv02025
Plaintiff:
John McKendree
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Cormier v Waxler Transportation
as 2:2009cv02147
Plaintiff:
Thomas Cormier
Defendant:
Waxler Transporation Company and Waxler Transporation Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Herndon v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
as 2:2008cv02208
Plaintiff:
Fred Allen Herndon, Fred Allen Herndon and Fred Allen Herndon
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Warhurst v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 2:2007cv02627
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Warhurst and Kenneth Warhurst
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Lodgian, Inc and Lodgian Hotels, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Campbell v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe, Corporation
as 2:2007cv02286
Plaintiff:
Michael Campbell
Defendant:
Burlington Northern Santa Fe, Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Harrell v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad
as 2:2007cv02072
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Harrell
Defendant:
Illinois Central Gulf Railroad
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
