US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,980
Norris v. Whiteville Correctional Facility
as 1:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
Dexter Norris, Jr.
Defendant:
Whiteville Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rush v. Berry et al
as 1:2023cv01271
Plaintiff:
Cody Allen Rush
Defendant:
Rick Berry and Suzanne Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Windsor
as 1:2023cv01268
Plaintiff:
James Shelton
Defendant:
FNU Windsor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Obion County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv01260
Plaintiff:
Bryan K Watkins
Defendant:
Obion County Jail and Jennifer Shirley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buchanan v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv02758
Plaintiff:
Conelius Buchanan
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, J. Baidoo and C. Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cress v. Centurion Medical Inc.
as 1:2023cv01258
Plaintiff:
Kevin Edward Cress
Defendant:
Centurion Medical Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Holmes et al
as 1:2023cv01252
Plaintiff:
Corey Miller
Defendant:
HSA Holmes, C. Nunnally, Nechol Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Avis Car Rental
as 2:2023cv02732
Plaintiff:
Donald Haynes
Defendant:
Avis Car Rental
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. Madison County Criminal Justice Complex
as 1:2023cv01238
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Webb
Defendant:
Madison County Criminal Justice Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maness v. Henderson County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv01234
Plaintiff:
Samuel Maness
Defendant:
Henderson County Jail, Nursing Staff, Jeff Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
