Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Torts - Injury - Motor Vehicle Product Liability Cases filed in the Texas Northern District Court before David C Godbey [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 5 of 5
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
June 19, 2009
Comstock v. Isuzu Motors, Ltd TX Northern Godbey Motor Vehicle Product Liability Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff: Jean Comstock, Jean Comstock Defendant: Isuzu Motors, Ltd
 
April 17, 2009
State Farm Lloyds Insurance Company et al v. General Motors Corporation et al TX Northern Godbey Motor Vehicle Product Liability Federal Question
Plaintiff: State Farm Lloyds Insurance Company, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company; Defendant: General Motors Corporation, Microheat Inc, Classic Buick Pontiac GMC, Ltd
 
March 31, 2009
Porter v. Toyota Motor Corporation TX Northern Godbey Motor Vehicle Product Liability Diversity
Plaintiff: Daryl Ray Porter; Defendant: Toyota Motor Corporation
 
January 20, 2009
Hicks et al v. General Motors Corporation TX Northern Godbey Motor Vehicle Product Liability Diversity
Plaintiff: Cindy Hicks, Gary Hicks; Defendant: General Motors Corporation
 
October 13, 2008
Wallis et al v. General Motors Corporation TX Northern Godbey Motor Vehicle Product Liability Diversity
Plaintiff: Charlie Wallis, Bonnie Wallis; Defendant: General Motors Corporation
 
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.