US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 4,955
FILED IN ERROR v. FILED IN ERROR
as 2:2024cv00042
Defendant:
Guadalupe Pompa, Jr., Robert Dan Riza and FILED IN ERROR
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly filed
as 4:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
Mr. Rowland M. Andrade and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
ABTC Corp. and IRS (United States of America)
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Mr. Rowland M. Andrade and ABTC Corp.
Defendant:
IRS - SD TX
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
UBS Financial Services, Inc. et al v. Dormier
as 4:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
UBS Financial Services, Inc. and UBS Credit Corp.
Defendant:
Christine Tan Dormier
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024mc00227
Plaintiff:
Filed Incorrectly
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Flores et al v. General Motors LLC
as 7:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Alexis Flores and Rubicela Davila
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Pilot VII Services Inc.
as 1:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
Pilot VII Services Inc.
Claimant:
Robyn Dunkin, Clay Dunkin and Brazos-Santiago Pilots, LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30511 Action by Owner for Limitation
Thornton v. Solar Grids LLC
as 4:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Pabriny Thornton
Defendant:
Solar Grids LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Guzman v. City of Houston et al
as 4:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Guzman
Defendant:
City of Houston and Samuel Pena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gallegos v. Ford Motor Company
as 5:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Miguel Gallegos
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
