US District Court for the District of Utah Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Buck v. Kentucky Horse Racing Commission et al
as 2:2013cv00342
Plaintiff:
Edward Allan Buck
Defendant:
Kentucky Horse Racing Commission, Robert M. Beck, Edward S. Bonnie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Maxfield Candy v. YRC Worldwide
as 2:2013cv00233
Plaintiff:
Maxfield Candy
Defendant:
YRC Worldwide
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
The Sun Products v. The Dial Corporation
as 2:2012cv00151
Plaintiff:
The Sun Products
Defendant:
The Dial Corporation
Counter_claimant:
The Dial Corporation
Counter_defendant:
The Sun Products
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Prime Investors v. Club LeSpri
as 2:2011cv00525
Plaintiff:
Prime Investors
Defendant:
Club LeSpri
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Stock Canyons v. Morinda Properties Escala Lodges et al
as 2:2011cv00326
Plaintiff:
Stock Canyons
Defendant:
Morinda Properties Escala Lodges , US Bank and Unit 423 Escala Lodges Condominiums
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gatt v. Express Recovery Services
as 2:2010cv01135
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Gatt
Defendant:
Express Recovery Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PNC Mortgage v. Hatton et al
as 2:2010cv01101
Plaintiff:
PNC Mortgage
Defendant:
John H. Hatton and Kristine W. Hatton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chase Home Finance v. Rogers et al
as 2:2010cv00453
Plaintiff:
Chase Home Finance
Defendant:
Gary D. Rogers and Kelly E. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Holdman Studios v. UPS Freight Services
as 2:2010cv00228
Plaintiff:
Holdman Studios
Defendant:
UPS Freight Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Nutraceutical v. SAIA Motor Freight Line
as 2:2010cv00120
Plaintiff:
Nutraceutical and Nutraceutical
Defendant:
SAIA Motor Freight Line
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
