US District Court for the District of Utah Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 856
Perkins v. Instant Brands
as 2:2021cv00229
Defendant:
Instant Brands
Plaintiff:
Lucy Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Russell v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00226
Defendant:
Cook Medical, Cook Group Incorporated, Cook Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Geertruida H. Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Symes et al v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00185
Defendant:
Cook Medical, Cook Medical Incorporated, William Cook Europe APS and others
Plaintiff:
Brad L. Symes and Peggy L. Symes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00116
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular
Plaintiff:
Matthew Richard Jones and Ashlee Marie Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia v. CAID Industries
as 1:2021cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jesus Joel Garcia
Defendant:
CAID Industries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hild v. United Sports Brand et al
as 2:2021cv00108
Defendant:
Shock Doctor Inc doing business as Shock Doctor, United Sports Brand and Dick's Sporting Goods Inc doing business as Dick's Sporting Goods
Plaintiff:
Robert Hild
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon v. Wright Medical Technology et al
as 2:2021cv00079
Plaintiff:
Richard Dixon
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology and Wright Medical Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Ekker v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2020cv00904
Plaintiff:
Linda Ekker
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Comried v. Nils Master USA
as 2:2020cv00891
Defendant:
Nils Master USA
Plaintiff:
Melvin Comried
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reed v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations et al
as 1:2020cv00167
Defendant:
Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, Bridgestone, Firestone Industrial Products and others
Plaintiff:
Kalliann Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
