US District Court for the District of Vermont Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 103
Pham v. General Growth Properties Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00002
Plaintiff:
Vicky Yen Pham
Defendant:
General Growth Properties Inc. and Schindler Elevator Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cote v. Robert Bosch Tool Corporation
as 1:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
Roger Cote
Defendant:
Robert Bosch Tool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cernansky v. Lefebvre et al
as 2:2014cv00180
Plaintiff:
Charles Cernansky
Defendant:
Tyler Lefebvre, Pioneers Board Shop, Inc. and Russ Owen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kershaw v. Techtronic Industries North America, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00076
Plaintiff:
Robert Kershaw
Defendant:
Techtronic Industries North America, Inc. , One World Technologies, Inc. and Ryobi Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Loyer v. Barbco, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00199
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Loyer
Defendant:
Barbco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jewell v. Fletcher Allen Health Care et al
as 2:2013cv00157
Plaintiff:
Doris A. Jewell
Defendant:
Fletcher Allen Health Care and Marion Foley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Hoyt v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv00001
Plaintiff:
Donna L. Hoyt
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Halsey v. Smith & Nephew GmbH et al
as 5:2012cv00171
Plaintiff:
David A. Halsey
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew GmbH, Smith & Nephew, Inc. and Smith & Nephew PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunnells v. TechTrade, LLC
as 5:2012cv00047
Plaintiff:
Bryan Dunnells
Defendant:
TechTrade, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dorsky v. DePuy Orthopedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00247
Plaintiff:
Franklin Dorsky
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
