Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

P. Petitions - Civil Rights Cases filed in the Virginia Western District Court before James P. Jones [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 8 of 8
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
October 15, 2007
Lovelace v. Bassett et al VA Western Jones Civil Rights Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff: Leroy A. Lovelace; Defendant: Kathleen Bassett, Mike Oslin, Larry Huffman
 
June 12, 2007
Bowers v. United States Federal Government et al VA Western Jones Civil Rights Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff: Dylan Tee Bowers; Defendant: United States Federal Government, Tony Diorno, Snapp, United States Marshals Service, Don Williams, Jr.
 
April 17, 2007
Shelton v. United States Of America VA Western Jones Civil Rights Fed. Question
Plaintiff: David Joe Shelton; Defendant: United States Of America
 
February 6, 2007
Bergara v. Chafin VA Western Jones Civil Rights Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff: Marjil Lee Bergara; Defendant: A. Benton Chafin
 
January 19, 2006
Giarratano v. Johnson et al VA Western Jones Civil Rights Prisoner Civil Rights
March 7, 2005
Montgomery v. Johnson et al VA Western Jones Civil Rights Federal Question: Bivens Act
April 21, 2004
Stanley v. Smith et al VA Western Jones Civil Rights Prisoner Civil Rights
May 29, 2001
Monroe v. State of Virginia, et al VA Western Jones Civil Rights Prisoner Civil Rights
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.