US District Court for the Western District of Virginia Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 96
Computer Patent Systems, LLC v. Wagan Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv00037
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
University of Virginia Patent Foundation v. Hamilton Company et al
as 3:2013cv00033
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
McAirlaids, Inc. v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation et al
as 7:2013cv00193
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
IPVX Patent Holdings, Inc. v. Donoma, Inc.
as 7:2013cv00173
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Freedom Hawk Kayak, LLC v. YA Tai Electric Appliances Co. Ltd
as 7:2012cv00305
Plaintiff:
Freedom Hawk Kayak, LLC
Defendant:
YA Tai Electric Appliances Co. Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Robinson v. Bartlow et al
as 3:2012cv00024
Defendant:
Kyle Bartlow, Does 1-5, Inclusive, Mariah Gentry and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Select Retrieval, LLC v. Winchester Carpet & Rug Company
as 5:2012cv00001
Plaintiff:
Select Retrieval, LLC
Defendant:
Winchester Carpet & Rug Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Rubbermaid Commercial Products LLC v. Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc.
as 5:2011cv00138
Defendant:
Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rubbermaid Commercial Products LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Ashbury International Group, Inc. v. Cadex Defence, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00079
Plaintiff:
Ashbury International Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Cadex Defence, Inc. and Drake Associates, Inc.
Interested Party:
Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Technical Concepts Bentfield B. V. v. Rochester Midland Corporation et al
as 5:2011cv00119
Defendant:
Hygiene Vision Limited and Rochester Midland Corporation
Plaintiff:
Technical Concepts Bentfield B. V.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
