US District Court for the Western District of Virginia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,217
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bermeo v. Andis et al
as 1:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Dyanie Bermeo
Defendant:
Blake Andis, Scott Snapp, Jamie Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fuqua v. Centra Health, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Tre'Mane Fuqua
Defendant:
Centra Health, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Harless v. BAE Systems Controls, Inc.
as 7:2023cv00689
Plaintiff:
Stephen Warner Harless
Defendant:
BAE Systems Controls, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Dugger v. Stiltner
as 1:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Mathew R Dugger
Defendant:
Eddie Stiltner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dugger v. Buchanan County Department of Social Services et al
as 1:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Mathew R Dugger
Defendant:
Buchanan County Department of Social Services and Bridgett McGraw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dugger v. Mays
as 1:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Mathew R Dugger
Defendant:
Jennifer Mays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Suiter v. Taylor et al
as 5:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Antwhon Suiter
Defendant:
Deputy C.J. Taylor, Augusta County Sheriff's Department, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
