US District Court for the Western District of Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Cooper v. Mullen et al
as 7:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
B. Mullen and WRSP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
M.B. v. United States of America, et. al.
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
M.B.
Defendant:
United States of America, J.C. Streeval, Dr. Kareem Wasim, PsyD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
M.L. et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
M.L., E.W. and S.W.
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Colette Peters, Christopher Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rice v. Kilgore et al
as 7:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Keith Rice
Defendant:
Major Kilgore, Captain McCoy, Corp. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Staff of WRSP et al
as 7:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Staff of WRSP, Med Team, CO Kenney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Wise et al
as 7:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Justin Michael Miller
Defendant:
J. Wise and T. Tatum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. Government of the Virgin Islands et al
as 7:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Cecil Francis
Defendant:
Government of the Virgin Islands, B. Davis, Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lassiter v. Looney et al
as 7:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Looney, Lt. Fleming, Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacques, Patrick v. Captain Bowles et al
as 7:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jacques
Defendant:
Captain Bowles, S. Scott, Counselor Calton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cooper v. McDuffy
as 7:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
McDuffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
