US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Cases 21 - 30 of 25,004
Hartsfield v. United States Army
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Hartsfield
Defendant:
United States Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Cockhern v. Warden of U.S.P. Lee
as 7:2024cv00260
Petitioner:
Anthony Cockhern
Respondent:
Warden of U.S.P. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Compton v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Medical et al
as 7:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Jeffery D. Compton
Defendant:
Nurse Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Medical and Addiction Counselor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Mullen et al
as 7:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
B. Mullen and WRSP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Ffitch
as 7:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC and Madeline Ffitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Oakes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Oakes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Robinson v. Halmolton
as 7:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
David Robinson
Defendant:
Chad Halmolton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavis v. Stump et al
as 7:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jason Chavis
Defendant:
K-9 Officer Stump, J.A. Murray, Alfed Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
