Virginia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 10,806
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Wrongful Termination of Employment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
David v. Virginia Employment Commissioner
as 3:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Jeanette D. David
Defendant:
Virginia Employment Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Gilder et al v. Charlie Daniels Racing, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Rufus Gilder and Sonia Gilder
Defendant:
Charlie Daniels Racing, LLC, Brian W. Lown, Esquire, Charisse M. Mullen, Esquire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hodges v. Cevallos
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Michael Prince Hodges
Defendant:
Gabrielle Camille Cevallos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Assault, Libel, Slander
Lyons v. Hoppe
as 5:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Samuel A. Lyons
Defendant:
Joel C. Hoppe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
