US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,556
Bone v. Mental Health
as 1:2024cv03037
Plaintiff:
Broderick J Bone
Defendant:
Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Eastern State Hospital
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Bryan Paul Hernandez
Defendant:
Eastern State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Mott
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Bryan Paul Hernandez
Defendant:
Carrie Ash Mott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Gallagher et al
as 4:2024cv05028
Plaintiff:
Carl Alonzo Brooks
Defendant:
K Gallagher, Lisa Robtoy, Lori Ramsdellgilkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randhawa v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv05027
Plaintiff:
Satnam S Randhawa
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Mark Phillip, Mark Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reevis v. Eastern State Hospital
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
Eastern State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rojas-Rivera v. USA
as 2:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Victor M Rojas-Rivera
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Coley v. DOC Superintendent
as 2:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
Blayne Jeffrey Coley
Respondent:
DOC Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Andrewjeski
as 4:2024cv05024
Petitioner:
Dakota Edward Stevens
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barragan Jr v. Andrewjeski
as 2:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Francisco Barragan Jr
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
