US District Court for the Western District of Washington Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 892
Oppenheimer v. eXp Realty LLC
as 2:2021cv01304
Plaintiff:
David G Oppenheimer
Defendant:
eXp Realty LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Morisky v. MMAS Research LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01301
Plaintiff:
Donald E Morisky
Defendant:
MMAS Research LLC, Steven Trubow, polina feilbach and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Harbron v. HubPages Inc
as 2:2021cv01288
Plaintiff:
Patrick Harbron
Defendant:
HubPages Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Bungie Inc v. Bansal et al
as 2:2021cv01111
Plaintiff:
Bungie Inc
Defendant:
Kunal Bansal doing business as Lavicheats.com and Does 1-30
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Bungie Inc v. Veterancheats.com et al
as 2:2021cv01114
Plaintiff:
Bungie, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and Bungie Inc
Defendant:
VETERANCHEATS.COM, DOE 1 a/k/a BLAZE, DOE 2 a/k/a KNORR and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Lee v. Amazon.com Inc
as 2:2021cv01090
Plaintiff:
Beom Su Lee
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc doing business as Amazon.com
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Wisser v. KTreks Inc
as 2:2021cv01072
Plaintiff:
Bill Wisser
Defendant:
KTreks Inc. and KTreks Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Methinx Entertainment, LLC et al v. Entertainment Magpie, Ltd.
as 2:2021cv01049
Plaintiff:
Methinx Entertainment, LLC, American Cinema Inspires, Inc., Methinx Entertainment LLC and others
Defendant:
Entertainment Magpie, Ltd. doing business as Zoverstocks doing business as musicMagpie and Entertainment Magpie Ltd doing business as Zoverstocks doing business as musicMagpie
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Gould v. Maven Coalition Inc
as 2:2021cv00903
Plaintiff:
Peter Gould
Defendant:
Maven Coalition, Inc. and Maven Coalition Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Cuffaro v. Rhapsody International Inc
as 2:2021cv00824
Plaintiff:
Chris Cuffaro
Defendant:
Rhapsody International Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.