Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Cases filed in the West Virginia Northern District Court before Joseph R. Goodwin

Browse by Type of Lawsuit

 



Cases filed in the West Virginia Northern District Court before Joseph R. Goodwin [ Court Info ]
Results 1 - 7 of 7
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
August 31, 2009
Husband v. Kornbrath et al WV Northern Goodwin Civil Rights Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff: Eunice Husband Defendant: Brian J. Kornbrath, Federal Public Defender Office
 
April 5, 2007
Loss et al v. Kendle International, CPU, LLC et al WV Northern Keeley Fair Labor Standards Act Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff: Michael Loss, Ann Sandor, Susan Jenkins, Carol Strang, Tammy Hunnell; Defendant: Kendle International, CPU, LLC, Kendle International, Inc., Hiller Hardie, Yolanda Kaull
 
October 14, 2005
Stonestreet v. Bukreyev WV Northern Goodwin Insurance Diversity-Notice of Removal
September 27, 2005
McGough v. Nalco Company WV Northern Goodwin Other Contract Diversity-Contract Dispute
August 17, 2005
Westfall v. Kendle International, CPU, LLC et al WV Northern Goodwin Fair Labor Standards Act Fair Labor Standards Act
November 19, 2004
Bituminous Casualty v. Mike Ross, Inc. WV Northern Goodwin Insurance Diversity-Insurance Contract
October 16, 2003
Regal Coal, et al v. Larosa, et al WV Northern Goodwin Other Contract Declaratory Judgment
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.