District Court Cases in West Virginia

Cases filed
Cases 71 - 80 of 140,463
Peterson v. Ward
as 3:2024cv00116
Petitioner: Quinton Peterson
Respondent: Josh Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fleitas v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00112
Petitioner: Carlos Fleitas
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pryor v. City of Charleston et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff: Jerome Pryor
Defendant: City of Charleston
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Harper v. Magistrate and Circuit Courts of Cabell County et al
as 3:2024cv00113
Plaintiff: Holly R. Harper
Defendant: Magistrate and Circuit Courts of Cabell County, Dan Ferguson, J. E. Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ali v. Lumico Life Insurance Company
as 5:2024cv00046
Plaintiff: Keith Ali
Defendant: Lumico Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Type: Contract Insurance
Miller v. USA
as 5:2024cv00047
Petitioner: Kamron Eugene Miller, Sr.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Miller v. Fleming
as 5:2024cv00045
Plaintiff: Andrew Miller
Defendant: Correctional Officer Fleming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Posey v. Correctional Officer Fleming
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff: William Posey
Defendant: Correctional Officer Fleming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff: Dee Dee Dallas Williams
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rolens et al v. Tug Hill Operating, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00044
Plaintiff: Ronald Rolens and Kimberly Rolens
Defendant: Tug Hill Operating, LLC, EQT Corporation and Enerstar Rentals and Services, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?