US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Torts - Property Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 96
Murphy v. Wisconsin Central Limited
as 2:2019cv01232
Defendant:
Canadian National Railroad Company and Wisconsin Central Ltd
Plaintiff:
Frank Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taber v. Leica Biosystems Inc
as 2:2019cv00381
Plaintiff:
Frank Taber
Defendant:
Leica Biosystems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2019cv00212
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Africa K Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Smith v Record Quest LLC
as 2:2019cv00025
Plaintiff:
Daphne Smith
Defendant:
RecordQuest LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Markel American Insurance Company v. Centerpointe Yacht Services LLC et al
as 2:2018cv02017
Plaintiff:
Markel American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Centerpointe Yacht Services LLC, ABC Corporations 1-5 and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harwood v. Healthcare Technology Enabled Services LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01941
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Harwood
Defendant:
Milwaukee Radiologists Ltd SC and Healthcare Technology Enabled Services LLC
Intervenor Defendant:
Acuity, a Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vanselow v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv01942
Plaintiff:
Zane Vanselow
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and Midwest Area Physicians LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moya v. Walgreen Co
as 2:2018cv01785
Defendant:
Walgreen Co
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Moya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Verisma Systems Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00464
Plaintiff:
Sakhone Harris
Defendant:
Verisma Systems Inc and Froedtert Health Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rave v. Ciox Health LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00305
Plaintiff:
Timothy Rave
Defendant:
Ciox Health LLC and Columbia St Mary's Hospital Milwaukee Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
