US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,593
Wouts v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2023cv01558
Petitioner:
Alex A Wouts
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blunt v. Stevens
as 2:2023cv01533
Petitioner:
Lamarr Deprice Blunt
Respondent:
Warden Christopher Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brookshire v. Gierach
as 2:2023cv01512
Petitioner:
Dennis J Brookshire
Respondent:
Christopher Stevens and Warden Michael Gierach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Puchner v. Severson et al
as 2:2023cv01523
Petitioner:
John D Puchner
Respondent:
Eric Severson, Mike Maxwell, Hon Pepper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Tucker v. Eplett
as 2:2023cv01468
Petitioner:
Gregory Tucker
Respondent:
Warden Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lucas v. Emil
as 2:2023cv01462
Petitioner:
Jerry Darnell Lucas, Jr
Respondent:
Toney Emil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arrington v. Hepp
as 2:2023cv01458
Petitioner:
Richard M. Arrington
Respondent:
Randall Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meeks v. DeHaan
as 1:2023cv01410
Petitioner:
Jerry J Meeks
Respondent:
Sue DeHaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Bull
as 2:2023cv01405
Petitioner:
Alan Smith
Respondent:
Denita Bull
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sease v. Eplett
as 2:2023cv01388
Petitioner:
Daniel D Sease
Respondent:
Warden Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
