Wisconsin Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 6,838
Hang et al v. Halloin et al
as 2:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Mailee Hang, Tou Vang Hang, Mailee Hang Estate and Trust and others
Defendant:
Scott R Halloin, Sheila L Shadman Emerson, Molly S Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Shaw et al v. Advocate Aurora Health Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Patrick Shaw, Debra Shaw and Haley Shaw
Defendant:
Advocate Aurora Health Inc and Aurora Health Care Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
United States of America, et al v. Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa
as 3:2022cv00151
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
McDowell, Titus v. Seventh Ave, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Titus McDowell
Defendant:
Seventh Ave, Inc. and John Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sanchez, Lena v. Montgomery Ward, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Lena Sanchez
Defendant:
Montgomery Ward, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
