District Court Cases in Wisconsin
Cases 11 - 20 of 46,200
American Fidelity Assurance Company v. Myers, Savannah et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
American Fidelity Assurance Company
Defendant:
Savannah Myers, Jorge Hernandez-Beltran and Unknown Administrator of the Estate of Joshua Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Costillo v. USA
as 3:2024cv00251
Petitioner:
Jeffrey A. Costillo
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Stewart v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Julius Stewart
Defendant:
SA Johnson and Milwaukee County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larpen SUpply Co., Inc. v. Wescast Industries, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Larpen SUpply Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Wescast Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Watts v. Hoffman
as 1:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
David Watts
Defendant:
Michael Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fitzl v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Susan M Fitzl
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lush, Stephen v. Van Rybroek, Gregory
as 3:2024cv00243
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Choice, Varick v. Rott, Robin et al
as 3:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Varick C. Choice
Defendant:
Robin L. Rott and Jane Schunk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
