Autoliv ASP, Inc. v. Hyundai Mobis Co.,Ltd. et al
| Autoliv ASP, Inc. |
| Hyundai Mobis Co.,Ltd. and Mobis Alabama, L.L.C. |
| 2:2013cv00141 |
| March 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Myron H. Thompson |
| Wallace Capel |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
303
ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The parties' 294 & 295 objections are OVERRULED; (2) The 291 Recommendation is ADOPTED; (3) Plf's 200 motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED as follows: (a) The accused products infrin ge the Base End Closure Element, as found in claims 1 and 20 of U.S. Patent No. 7,347,450; (b) The terms "a region" and "such that the gas rapidly exits" as found in U.S. Patent No. 7,614,653 are not indefinite; (c) U.S. Patent No . 7,347,450 is not obvious, as prior art directed to parachute references is not analogous art; (d) The asserted patents are not obvious on any ground upon which Dfts failed to identify a motivation to combine, as identified in Autoliv's Memoran dum (Doc. # 206 -1, at 32-38; see also Doc. # 200 -1, at 2 (Proposed Judgment)); (e) Because Dfts failed to articulate a reasonable expectation of success in combining the prior art, the asserted patents are not obvious; and (f) Claims 26-27, 35-37 , and 40 of U.S. Patent No. 7,614,653 are not obvious or anticipated (4) Dfts' 201 motion for summary judgment of non-infringement and no enhanced damages is GRANTED on dependent claims 26 and 27 of U.S. Patent No. 7,614,653, which both refer to claim 20; the 201 motion DENIED as moot as to the withdrawn claims; and the 201 motion otherwise is DENIED; This action proceeds to trial on Claims 1-2, 6, 8-10, and 20 of U.S. Patent No. 7,347,450 and on Claims 3537 and 40 of U.S. Patent No. 7,614,653. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/5/2021. (wcl, )
|
|
Filing
269
ORDERED that a status conference in this case is hereby set for November 4, 2020, at 11:00 a.m., CST, by video conferencing via ZoomGov Meeting before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge. No later than five minutes prior to the start o f the conference, the parties shall join the proceeding via Zoom. A member of the undersigned's chamber's staff will email the attorneys for the parties with the Zoom link to join the conference. If for some reason a party experiences technical difficulties, that party should seek direction by calling chambers at (334) 954-3700, but only after first attempting to rejoin the call. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 10/19/2020. (furn: CB, Calendar)(kh, )
|
|
Filing
112
ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. # 108 ) be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. The Defendants proposed construction of the claim term "terminal end," be and is hereby REJECTED and the plain and ordinary meaning o f the term known to persons of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention be and is hereby ADOPTED; and 3. This case be and is hereby REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Emily C. Marks on 10/3/2018. (kh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
