Lane v. Bullock County Correctional Facility, et al
| Lori Lane |
| M. Buck, Rebekah Stough, Dr. Siddig, Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Limestone Correctional Facility, Bullock County Correctional Facility, S. Garrison, N. Walton and Alabama Department of Corrections |
| 2:2013cv00280 |
| April 23, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Madison |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| W. Harold Albritton |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing as follows: (1) The 25 Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is GRANTED and all federal and state claims against the Bullock County Correctional Facility, Limestone Correctional Facili ty, and the Alabama Department of Corrections are DISMISSED, and they are DISMISSED as party Defendants; (2) Any fictitious parties referred to in the First Amended Complaint are also DISMISSED. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/21/13. (scn, )
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER directing as follows: (1) The 1 Complaint is STRICKEN, and the Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file an Amended Complaint conforming with this Order no later than July 12, 2013; (2) The 11 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 6/28/13. (scn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
