Bailey v. Meeks, et al. (INMATE 2)
William Bailey |
Kenneth Northey, Bill Godwin, Dianne Williams, Dr. McWatters, Preston Hughes, Dennis Meeks, Joe Barton, Harold Elmore and Carl Truman |
2:2013cv00439 |
June 20, 2013 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Montgomery Office |
Covington |
Charles S. Coody |
Truman M. Hobbs |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 OPINION AND ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: (1) The 8 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; (2) The plaintiff's claims against the Covington County Commissioners be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii); (3 ) The Covington County Commissioners be and are hereby DISMISSED as defendants to this cause of action; (4) The plaintiff's access to courts claim against the named defendants be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of proces s pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and (5) This case, with regard to the remaining defendants, be and is hereby REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 8/20/13. (scn, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.