Clay v. Thompson et al(MAG+)
Clarence Clay |
Rosemary Barkett, R. Lanier Anderson, Charles R. Wilson, Jerusha T. Adams, Charles S. Coody, Terry F. Moore, Louis V. Franklin, Myron H. Thompson, Gerald Tjoflat, Susan H. Black, Stanley F. Birch and Edward Carnes |
2:2014cv00131 |
February 28, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Montgomery Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Susan Russ Walker |
William Keith Watkins |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 ORDER: Upon consideration of the 35 Recommendation and the 41 Objections, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation is ADOPTED, the Objections are OVERRULED, Defendants' 17 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/23/2014. (dmn, ) |
Filing 38 (VACATED pursuant to 40 ORDER) ORDER: On 6/26/2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. 35 ). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of t he Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation is ADOPTED, Defendants motion to dismiss (Doc. 17 ) is GRANTED, and that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/16/2014. (dmn, ) Modified on 7/16/2014 (djy, ). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.