Benjamin v. Bank of America, N.A.
| Alyson Benjamin |
| Bank of America, N.A., Green Tree Servicing LLC and BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP |
| 2:2014cv00575 |
| June 6, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Montgomery |
| Charles S. Coody |
| Mark E. Fuller |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER directing as follows: (1) defendant Green Tree Servicing, LLC's 20 objection is OVERRULED; (2) the ADOPTING 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (3) plf Alyson Benjamin's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice due to her failure to prosecute this action and comply with orders of this court. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 5/7/15. (djy, )
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER GRANTING 14 & 15 MOTIONS for Michael A. Fritz, Sr. & C. Richard Hill, Jr. to Withdraw as Attorneys; directing the clerk to mail a copy of this order to plaintiff at the address listed for plf by counsel in their motions to withdraw; fur ther ORDERING that plf has until 11/13/2014 to find new counsel and to have said counsel make an appearance in this matter, as further set out in order; further ORDERING that this action is STAYED until further order of the court. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 10/16/14. (djy, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
