Wilson v. Strange et al (JOINT ASSIGN)
Plaintiff: Betty Wilson
Defendant: Luther Strange, Madison County District Attorney's Office and Robert L. Broussard
Case Number: 2:2014cv01106
Filed: October 23, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Elmore
Presiding Judge: Terry F. Moorer
Presiding Judge: Myron H. Thompson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 74 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The US Magistrate Judge's 65 Recommendation is ADOPTED; (2) The Plf's 39 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; and (3) The Dfts' 38 Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED to the extent it seeks a declaration that Code of Alabama 15-18-200 is not facially unconstitutional but DENIED to the extent it seeks other relief. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr on 3/30/2022. (bes, )
October 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 29 OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 27 ) is adopted. (2) Defendants' Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss (doc. no. 8 ) is granted in part, and denied in part , as stated above and explained in the magistrate judge's recommendation. (3) The claims in Counts I, II, III, and IV that invite the court to review state-court decisions are dismissed without prejudice. (4) Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) motio n to dismiss (doc. no. 8 ) is denied as to plaintiff's claim in Count I that Alabama's DNA law is facially unconstitutional, and is granted as to her other claims. (5) With the exception of plaintiff's claim in Count I that Alabama� 39;s DNA law is facially unconstitutional, Counts I, II, III and IV are dismissed without prejudice. This case is not closed, and is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/17/2018. (kh, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilson v. Strange et al (JOINT ASSIGN)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Betty Wilson
Represented By: Peter D. Isakoff
Represented By: Wesley Clyde Redmond
Represented By: Seema Saifee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Luther Strange
Represented By: James Clayton Crenshaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Madison County District Attorney's Office
Represented By: James Clayton Crenshaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert L. Broussard
Represented By: James Clayton Crenshaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?