Addiction & Mental Health Services Inc v. Ashcraft
Petitioner: Addiction & Mental Health Services Inc
Respondent: William Arthur Ashcraft
Case Number: 2:2013cv00623
Filed: April 4, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Southern Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: William M Acker
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge William M Acker, Jr on 06/03/2013. (CVA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Addiction & Mental Health Services Inc v. Ashcraft
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William Arthur Ashcraft
Represented By: Jonathan Corley
Represented By: Davis B Whittelsey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Addiction & Mental Health Services Inc
Represented By: Joshua S Thompson
Represented By: Alexandra M Shulman
Represented By: Carter H Dukes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?