Cougar Oil, Inc. v. Johnson

Defendant: James Elbert Johnson
Plaintiff: Cougar Oil, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2011mc00028
Filed: November 7, 2011
Court: Alabama Southern District Court
Office: Mobile Office
County: Mobile
Presiding Judge: William H. Steele
Referring Judge: Bert W. Milling
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: Transmission of Bankruptcy Reference

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 14, 2011 2 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 1 Motion for Leave to Appeal Bankruptcy Court's Order. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 11/14/2011. Copy emailed to Bankruptcy Court. (tgw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cougar Oil, Inc. v. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Elbert Johnson
Represented By: Utopia Conger Cassady
Represented By: Earl P. Underwood, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cougar Oil, Inc.
Represented By: John Edwin Searcy, Jr.
Represented By: George David Ray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.