Gill v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Ashley Gill |
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Sirote & Permutt, PC |
2:2015cv00162 |
March 23, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Selma Office |
Dallas |
Kristi K. DuBose |
Katherine P. Nelson |
Foreclosure |
12 U.S.C. ยง 191 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 114 Order: Case is remanded back to Dallas County, Alabama. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 9/6/2016. (srd) |
Filing 103 Order re: 64 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Ashley Gill and 65 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted as to each Plaintiff's claims found in Count 14 and granted in part as to the individual claim found in Count 16. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment as to Count 16 is denied in part as to the individual claim. The still pending portions of the motions for summary judgment remain under consideration. The parties shall brief the Court, as set out, before 7/5/16 and any responses shall be filed by 7/12/16. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 6/28/2016. (cmj) |
Filing 100 ORDER denying 87 Motion for Leave to File Amended Notice of Removal, as set out. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 6/9/2016. (cmj) |
Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 11 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Ashley Gill. Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. 11) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 6/16/2015. (cmj) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.