Lampley v. Schmidt

Defendant: Joseph D. Schmidt
Plaintiff: Jim Lampley
Case Number: 3:2012cv00236
Filed: November 29, 2012
Court: Alaska District Court
Office: Anchorage Office
County: Anchorage
Presiding Judge: Ralph R. Beistline
Referring Judge: John D. Roberts
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 18, 2013 27 Opinion or Order of the Court JDR ORDER GRANTING Motion 19 to Stay Proceedings. Upon completion of his {State} Grinols claim, Lampley will have thirty (30) days to amend his 2254 federal habeas petition and proceed in this federal court action. Petitioner to file Status Reports every 6 months, first of which is due 04/18/2014. Signed by Judge John D. Roberts on 10/18/2013. (JAM, Chambers Staff)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lampley v. Schmidt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph D. Schmidt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jim Lampley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.