Nukapigak et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
Jonah Nukapigak, Sam Kunaknana, Edward Nukapigak, Clarence Ahnupkana, Robert Nukapigak, Martha Itta and John Nicholls |
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Thomas P. Bostick and Christopher D. Lestochi |
3:2013cv00044 |
February 27, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Alaska |
Anchorage Office |
Anchorage |
Sharon L. Gleason |
Environmental Matters |
42 U.S.C. ยง 4332 Environmental Policy - Coop of Agency Repo |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 223 SECOND ORDER: re Motions for Summary Judgment: Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment 107 and Supplemental Briefing 214 ;ConocoPhillips' and the Corps' Cross Motions for Summary Judgment 127 and 131 . Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 05/26/2015. (AEM, CHAMBERS STAFF) |
Filing 175 ORDER: re Motions for Summary Judgment. Within 21 days of the date of this order, the parties in this case shall file and serve, either jointly or separately, a motion(s) or stipulation that proposes the further proceedings that should occur in this matter.Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 05/27/2014. (AEM, CHAMBERS STAFF) |
Filing 174 ORDER: denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction 149 . Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 03/12/2014. (AEM, CHAMBERS STAFF) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.