Penera v. Armenta

Appellant: Priscilla Penera
Appellee: Richard J Armenta
Case Number: 2:2008cv01966
Filed: October 27, 2008
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Bankruptcy Appeal (801) Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: James A Teilborg
Referring Judge:
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 30, 2009 10 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that the Bankruptcy Court's Order (Doc. #6 at 122) is AFFIRMED. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 06/30/09. (ESL)
September 24, 2009 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 11 Appellee's Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees and Costs as a Sanction Against a Frivolous Appeal. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 9/23/09.(LSP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Penera v. Armenta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Priscilla Penera
Represented By: Barbara Lee Caldwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Richard J Armenta
Represented By: Andrew M Ellis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.