Ally Financial Incorporated v. Jones
||Ally Financial Incorporated
||January 22, 2013
||Arizona District Court
||Phoenix Division Office
||XX US, Outside State
||Paul G Rosenblatt
|Nature of Suit:
||Property Rights: Trademark
|Cause of Action:
||15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 23, 2013
ORDER granting 14 Motion (Application) for Default Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Ally Financial, Inc. is awarded its reasonable attorneys' fees pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), contingent on the plaintiff filing a fee a pplication no later than August 26, 2013. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Ally Financial, Inc. is awarded its taxable costs to date in the amount of $447.20 pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d) (1), and is additionally awarded its cost incurred i n personally serving the Court's Order and the Court's Judgment on defendant Donald Jones. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of plaintiff Ally Financial Bank, Inc. accordingly. (See document for complete details). Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 7/23/13. (LAD)
|October 15, 2013
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application for Attorneys' Fees (Doc. 20 ) is granted to the extent that plaintiff Ally Financial, Inc. is awarded attorneys' fees from defendant Donald Jones in the total amount of $7,639.00. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 10/14/13. (LAD)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.