Rittenhouse v. Early Warning Services LLC

Defendant: Early Warning Services LLC
Plaintiff: Donna Rittenhouse
Case Number: 2:2013cv00769
Filed: April 17, 2013
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: John W Sedwick
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 29:621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 29, 2014 39 Opinion or Order of the Court *ORDER denying 32 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 7/29/14.(JWS) *Modified to attach corrected PDF; NEF regenerated on 07/29/2014 (APJ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rittenhouse v. Early Warning Services LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Early Warning Services LLC
Represented By: Robert Shawn Oller(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Brooke Dorothea Pfleeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donna Rittenhouse
Represented By: Trey A R Dayes, III(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.