Caballero v. Holder
Petitioner: Guadalupe Caballero
Respondent: Eric Himpton Holder, Jr.
Case Number: 2:2013cv00992
Filed: May 9, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Pinal
Presiding Judge: John W Sedwick
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1252 (a)(2) Injunction for Deportation
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER the Government's motion for summary judgment at docket 44 is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court will please enter judgment for defendant Eric. H. Holder, Jr. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 5/5/2014.(KMG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Caballero v. Holder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Eric Himpton Holder, Jr.
Represented By: Ada E Bosque
Represented By: Yamileth G Davila
Represented By: Matthew A Spurlock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Guadalupe Caballero
Represented By: Jacob Clyde Robertson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?