Nickolich v. Arizona Community Protection and Treatment Center et al
| Dushan Stephan Nickolich, II |
| Arizona Community Protection and Treatment Center, Arizona State Hospital, Corey Nelson, Gary Perrin, Bradley Johnson, Bruce McMorran and Erick D Pearson |
| 2:2013cv01188 |
| June 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| James F Metcalf (PS) |
| Stephen M McNamee |
| Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER granting 17 and 21 Plaintiff's Motions for Status to the extent this Order informs Plaintiff of the status of this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting 19 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; the First Amended Complaint (Doc. 18 ) and this action are dismissed for failure to state a claim and the Clerk must enter judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 1/12/15.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting 10 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint for failure to state a claim and the Complaint is dismissed with 30 days leave to amend. Clerk must enter dismissal with prejudice if Plaintiff fails to comply. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting 5 and 14 Plaintiff's Motions for status. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 9/3/14.(LSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
