Rowe v. Brewer et al
||Richard Allen Bock, Anne Reeder, Unknown Party, Anna Jacobs, Sally Walker, Charles L Ryan, Janice K Brewer, Adam Bradley, E Jensen and Unknown Wallace
||Ronald Allen Rowe
||July 25, 2013
||Arizona District Court
||Phoenix Division Office
||David G Campbell
||Mark E Aspey (PS)
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Prison Condition
|Cause of Action:
||42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|December 30, 2013
ORDER Plaintiff's July 25, 2013 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2 ) is granted. Plaintiff's September 9 2013 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 7 ) is denied as moot. As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is not assessed an initial partial filing fee. The Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is fil ed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that stat es that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 4 ) is denied. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 12/30/2013. (KMG)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.