Hrbenic #260775 v. Ryan et al
| Denijal Hrbenic |
| Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 2:2014cv02251 |
| October 9, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| David K Duncan (PS) |
| James A Teilborg |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34 ) is accepted and adopted; the objections (Doc. 37 ) are overruled; the Petition is denied and dismissed with prejudice and the Clerk shall enter judgment. Pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governi ng Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court denies issuance of a certificate of appealability because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 1/24/17. (LSP)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER: the motion to appoint counsel part of 35 is denied.; the motion for extension of time part of 35 is granted to the limited extent that Petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation are due 12/2/16. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 11/15/16.(REW)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER: Petitioner's appeal 31 is denied; Magistrate Judge Fine's Order 29 is affirmed. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 8/16/16. (REW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
