Fernandez v. Horne
Plaintiff: Fernando Fernandez
Defendant: Thomas C Horne
Case Number: 4:2013cv00368
Filed: May 22, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline M Rateau
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting 7 Motion to Dismiss; Accepted and adopting Report and Recommendations re 12 Report and Recommendation. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of Defendant and close this case.. Signed by Chief Judge Raner C Collins on 11/25/2013.(JKM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fernandez v. Horne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fernando Fernandez
Represented By: Rafael F Gallego
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas C Horne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?