Clifton v. Bailey et al
Curtis Wayne Clifton |
Octavious Bailey, Alonzo Cummings, Peggy Soward, Luther Whitfield and Mississippi County Detention Center |
3:2015cv00031 |
January 27, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Jonesboro Office |
Mississippi |
Beth Deere |
D. P. Marshall |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 JUDGMENT: Clifton's claims against the Mississippi County Detention Center are dismissed with prejudice. Clifton's official-capacity claims are dismissed without prejudice. Clifton's individual-capacity claims are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/10/2016. (jak) |
Filing 19 ORDER: Opposed partial recommendation, 6 , adopted on de novo review. Clifton's objection, 8 , is overruled. Clifton's claims against all defendants in their official capacities are dismissed without prejudice. His 1983 claims against the Mississippi County Detention Center are dismissed with prejudice because the jail can't be sued. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/17/2015. (jak) |
Filing 5 ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to prepare summonses for Defendants Bailey, Cummings, Schultz, and Whitfield. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve copies of the 2 Complaint, and summons for each defendant without prepayment of fees and costs or security. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 2/4/2015. (jak) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.