Pitonyak Machinery Corporation v. Crustbuster-Speed King Inc
Plaintiff: Pitonyak Machinery Corporation
Defendant: Crustbuster-Speed King Inc
Case Number: 4:2008cv00581
Filed: June 26, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Contract: Franchise Office
County: Arkansas
Presiding Judge: William R. Wilson
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER denying 14 Motion to Vacate Order and Stay Proceedings. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 10/2/08. (mkf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pitonyak Machinery Corporation v. Crustbuster-Speed King Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pitonyak Machinery Corporation
Represented By: Thomas S. Stone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Crustbuster-Speed King Inc
Represented By: Clinton D. McGue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?