Pitonyak Machinery Corporation v. Crustbuster-Speed King Inc
Pitonyak Machinery Corporation |
Crustbuster-Speed King Inc |
4:2008cv00581 |
June 26, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Contract: Franchise Office |
Arkansas |
William R. Wilson |
Plaintiff |
Diversity |
28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER denying 14 Motion to Vacate Order and Stay Proceedings. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 10/2/08. (mkf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pitonyak Machinery Corporation v. Crustbuster-Speed King Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Pitonyak Machinery Corporation | |
Represented By: | Thomas S. Stone |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Crustbuster-Speed King Inc | |
Represented By: | Clinton D. McGue |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.