Hiser v. XTO Energy Inc
Ruby Hiser |
XTO Energy Inc |
4:2011cv00517 |
June 24, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Little Rock Office |
White |
Brian S. Miller |
All Other Real Property |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 120 OPINION AND ORDER denying XTO's renewed motion for judgment as a matter of lawand motion for new trial 98 . Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 9/30/13. (kpr) |
Filing 116 ORDER. If the parties wish to make further requests of the Court or submissions for the Courts consideration regarding the pending post-trial motions in this matter, they are directed to do so on or before September 10,2013. The parties are directed to refrain from contacting jurors.. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/30/13. (kpr) |
Filing 113 ORDER re 110 Order on jury examination. Jurors set forth in this Order will be examined in Courtroom 4C of the Richard Sheppard Arnold U.S. Courthouse. Counsel may submit proposed questions by July 31, 2013. At the conclusion of each examination, the Court will conduct a bench conference with counsel to determine whether additional questions should be asked. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 7/26/13. (kpr) |
Filing 110 ORDER taking under advisement XTO's pending post-trial motions. The Court will conduct an inquiry of certain jurors. Counsel may attend this inquiry, and the Court will confer with counsel in advance of the proceedings. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 4/23/13. (kpr) |
Filing 107 ORDER denying 98 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 1/18/13. (kpr) |
Filing 84 JUDGMENT in favor of Ruby Hiser and against XTO Energy Inc in the amount of $300,000.00, together with post-judgment interest at the rate of 0.18% per annum from the date of the Judgment until paid pursuant to 76 Jury Verdict. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 9/10/12. (kpr) |
Filing 81 ORDER directing the Plaintiff to file a response to Defendant's motion to contact jurors by 5:00 p.m., Tuesday, September 4, 2012. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/31/12. (kpr) |
Filing 68 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 52 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 54 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/24/2012. (jlp) |
Filing 51 ORDER denying 36 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/14/12. (kpr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hiser v. XTO Energy Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: XTO Energy Inc | |
Represented By: | G. Alan Perkins |
Represented By: | James D. Rankin, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ruby Hiser | |
Represented By: | Joseph D. Hughes |
Represented By: | John T. Holleman, IV |
Represented By: | Maryna O. Jackson |
Represented By: | Amber R. Schubert |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.