Naples v. Williams et al
| James J Naples |
| Renee S Williams and Michael E Collins |
| 4:2013cv00547 |
| September 16, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Pulaski |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Appeal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1334 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
JUDGMENT: The Substitution Order is reversed on the effective date and otherwise affirmed. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/26/2015. (jak)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER reversing the substitution Order on the effective date in Case No. 4:13-cv-547. No-automatic-termination order in Case No. 4:13-cv-499 affirmed. Order denying relief from the stay in Case No. 4:14-cv-201 affirmed. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/29/2014. (jak)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER denying on jurisdiction Motions to Dismiss - 11 , 13 , 17 , 20 , & 22 but denying without prejudice to renewal of the no-standing points in the merits briefing. Appellants' briefs due by 15 October 2014, appellee's briefs due twenty-one days after filing of the brief being responded to; reply briefs due ten days thereafter. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/26/2014. (jak)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER consolidating 4:13-cv-667, 4:13-cv-670, and 4:13-cv-723 with this case and the lead case, 4:13-cv-499. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/13/14. (kpr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
