Doering v. Corizon Medical Services Inc et al
Alan Doering |
Lay, Richard, Corizon Medical Services Inc and Wendy Kelley |
5:2013cv00148 |
May 16, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Pine Bluff Office |
Lincoln |
Kristine G. Baker |
H. David Young |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 59 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 58 Order filed on this date, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is dismissed; that the relief sought is denied; and that the Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/14/2014. (rhm) |
Filing 46 ORDER ADOPTING 36 partial report and recommendation ; denying 29 motion for treatment or separate evaluation of mental health. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 4/14/2014. (mmd) |
Filing 45 ORDER adopting 43 Partial Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. 42 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is denied. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 4/11/2014. (ks) |
Filing 24 ORDER ADOPTING 14 Partial Report and Recommendations; and granting defts Lay and Kelley's 7 Motion to Dismiss to the extent that plaintiff's claims against them for monetary damages in their official capacity is dismissed and denied in all other respects.(kpr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.