Young v. Kelley
Plaintiff: Frederick Lewis Young , III
Defendant: Wendy Kelley
Case Number: 5:2015cv00118
Filed: April 14, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Pine Bluff Office
County: Izard
Presiding Judge: Kristine G. Baker
Presiding Judge: Jerome T. Kearney
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 25 JUDGMENT: Consistent with the 24 Order entered on this day, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that plaintiff Frederick Lewis Young's petition for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed with prejudice. The relief requested is denied and the Court denies issuance of a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 7/18/2017. (mef)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Young v. Kelley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frederick Lewis Young , III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wendy Kelley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?